Challenging the Norms: Damien Hirst and the Art of Marketing
Damien Hirst is an artist I greatly admire for his art and his unique approach to the art world. His artwork is undeniably striking and has the remarkable ability to stand out distinctively. However, there’s more to Hirst than just his artistic talent. He has embarked on an extensive marketing campaign, and everything about his career appears meticulously planned. Evidently, he has crafted a persona designed to spark conversations, whether those discussions lean toward the positive or negative. What matters most is the attention he garners from the press and the general public.
An Unconventional Journey
Damien Hirst was destined to gain attention due to his highly unconventional work. He entered the art scene during the late 1990s/2000 when the art world was focused on artists learning and honing their techniques while adhering to the same style. The typical journey for an artist was to attend art school, achieve high grades, and qualify. Like any trade, competition was fierce among numerous artists, and the more effort you invested in your quest for recognition, the greater your odds became.
Challenging the Establishment
I wouldn’t be surprised if Damien Hirst and the British pop artists were observing developments abroad in New York. Who challenged the status quo, redefining what the bourgeois deemed ‘art’ and ‘not art’? Think about the whole movement of artists like Andy Warhol.
The Art of Marketing
Becoming famous as an artist back then often boiled down to luck. If you managed to capture the attention of an art gallery, you’d become a professional artist, with the gallery overseeing marketing, pricing, and public relations. If things went according to plan, your art would cause a stir, people would invest in your skills, and fame could be achieved.
A Different Path
Andy Warhol and Damien Hirst took distinct approaches to the art world and questioned the established norms. They dismissed the art world’s rules and actively engaged in marketing, public relations, and business affairs. Andy Warhol enlisted individuals to create his art, setting him apart from other artists.
Damien Hirst also shook the art world by producing pieces that defied the establishment’s expectations. His work was designed to be striking and provoke a reaction, as evidenced by his series of deceased animals encased in large glass containers filled with formaldehyde. While I wouldn’t claim to be fond of this collection, I believe it disrespects the natural world and the animals we share it with. Nevertheless, I can comprehend his motivation, which elicited shock and bewilderment.
A Catalyst for Personal Expression
As I mentioned earlier, my admiration for Damien’s art is limited. Still, I deeply respect how he prompted me to contemplate my art and that I feel no obligation ‘to conform’. I’ve always believed that everything we do constitutes art; even our personalities are self-crafted, and our attire is a form of artistic expression.
Breaking the Mold
I’ve addressed this in past writings—the tendency to compartmentalize and label things excessively is toxic. The art establishment’s inclination to categorize “what qualifies as art” and “what doesn’t” doesn’t resonate with me; all it has accomplished is fostering competition between artists and art buyers. This enables individuals to partake in the capitalist game, amplifying the profitability of certain artworks over others and perpetuating the capitalist economy.
By doing so, we inadvertently restrict our horizons and perspectives. I refer back to a quote that succinctly captures my point of view: “To define is to limit” – Oscar Wilde.
I would like to express my gratitude to ChatGPT, an invaluable companion in the process of crafting this article, for its assistance in refining my thoughts and ideas.